Tema e ditës

Rakia - Shqiptare apo turke? Jepni mendimin tuaj nese rakia eshte dicka e jona apo turke? Ketu ku jame une dine shume pake per shqiperine dhe kur ra fjala per rakine u thashe se eshte pije tradicionale shqipetare por ata me thane qe ajo eshte turke.Me erdhi shume inat sepse ketu ne hollande ka shume turqer dhe ata e kane paraqitur si te tyre.Mbase e kame gabim por mendimi im eshte qe rakia eshte pija jone tradicionale. C'mendim keni?

.

Nano:Do te rikthejme 10-11% te fajdeve. TIRANE-Kryeminstri Fatos Nano deklaroi dje ne Parlament se deri ne fund te vitit 2004 do te perfundoje procesi i administrimit te pasurive te firmave piramidale per t,i hapur rruge kthimit te parave ish-kreditoreve.Sipas kryeministrit nga vlera e 310 aseteve te shitura,prone e ish-firmave rentiere,jane grumbulluar 50 milione dollare,qe do ti shtohen fondit prej 9.5 milione dollare leke gjendje te bllokuar ne banka para fillimit te procesit te trasparences.Nano tha se nga perllogaritjet e bera ,rikthimi i vleres se parave te depozituara ne kompanine piramidale varion ne koeficientet 10-15%.nderkohe qe per "Gjallicen"nje nga firmat kryesore te skemave piramidale,duket se koinficenti i kthimit te parave nuk shkon as 2% ,per t'ua kthyer mijera kreditoreve te saj.Por kreu i ekzekutivit shtoi se kompesimi i shumices se kreditoreve qe kishin depozituar parate e tyre ne kompanite huamarrese ,nuk do te shkoje me shume se 10-11%.Nano tha se "kjo vinte si pasoje e faktit se vetem 5-7% e pasurive te firmave piramidale ishin ngurtesuar ne asetet te cilat jane shitur dhe se kompanite nuk kishin aktivitet operues.Duke ju pergjigjur pyetjeve te kryetarit te Partise Levizja e Legalitetit Ekrem Spahia mbi ecurine e procesit te trasparences se firmave piramidale ,tha se tashme ishte arritur perfundimisht shperndarja e ketyre firmave dhe se te gjithe ish-drejtuesit e ketyre kompanive qe kishin sipas tij,artikitet SALI BERISHEN,jane pergjigjur para institucioneve te drejtesise ose jane nen hetim.Ai shtoi se BERISHA duhet te pergjigjej se ku i kishte cuar 1 miliarde dollare qe firmat piramidale kishin gjendje,para se te shpallnin falimentimin."Eshte pergatitur dhe se shpejti projekt vendimi per rinkopesimin e kreditoreve te shoqerive huamarrese me koificiente 10-11%,per te realizuar brenda vitit 2004 mbylljen e krejt procesit te transparences se skemave piramidale.Nuk e di se sa nga keto para shkuan per te financuar dy fushatat elektortale te PD-se ne vitin 1996,pasi shume nga firmat pas zgjedhjeve te tetorit ne ate vit,filluan te kishin probleme serioze financiare.Po keshtu dhe ne kohen e qeverise se Stabilitetit,u zhduken shuma te konsiderueshme nga shumat e ngrira ,-tha Nano. Kreu i qeverise tha se nuk kishte ndermend te pergjigjej per akuzat qe opozita kishte ngritur nje vite me pare ne komisionin hetimor per fajdet.Ai e konsideroi tejkalimin te se drejtes faktin qe nje perfaqesues i opozites,sqarime per ceshtjen e firmave,per te cillin mbajne pergjegjesine kryesore,pasi lulezimi i tyre u realizua gjate kohes se qeverisjes se PD-se.Nga ana tjeter,deputeti Spahia tha se PLL-se nuk kishte qene asnje here ne pushtet qe nga viti 1939 dhe nuk mund te mbante asnje pergjegjesi per ngritjen e kompanive piramidale.sipas tij,asetet e pasurive te firmave jane shitur me cmime minimale nga administratoret e vendosur nga qeveria.Ai shtoi se gati 30-35 milione dollare,pasuri e kompanive rentiere e depozituar ne banka jashte vendit,nuk jane terhequr ende nga shteti shqiptar.Spahia akuzoi Nanon se kishte mashtruar qytetaret shqiptare duke deklaruar ne vitin 1997 ne Vlore se do te kthente parate e humbura ne firma ne masen 100 per qind. Për ju,Tigri.

Shqiptari më budalla në histori Kush ka qenë sipas mendimit suaj?

Gjendje alarmante ne Irak, rezistenca kalon ne planin B? Cfare mendoni rreth shprehjes "amerikanet fituan betejen por lufta s'ka mbaruar"? A ka pregatitur me kohe Sadami rezistencen dhe luften e gjate guerrilje per shporrjen e okupatoreve? A jane te besueshem gjeneralet qe intervistohen? =========================== The liberation of Baghdad is not far away' By Alix de la Grange ============================ Editor's note: Coordinated attacks and skirmishes in several Iraqi cities on Thursday killed at least 66 people and wounded more than 250. Forty-four people were killed in a series of car bomb blasts in the northern city of Mosul and 216 wounded. Fighting in al-Anbar province, where there were clashes in Fallujah and Ramadi, killed at least nine people and wounded 27, and fighting around Baquba killed 13 and wounded 15. BAGHDAD - On the eve of the so-called transfer of sovereignty to the new Iraqi caretaker government on June 30, former Saddam Hussein generals turned members of the elite of the Iraqi resistance movement have abandoned their clandestine positions for a while to explain their version of events and talk about their plans. According to these Ba'ath officials, "the big battle" in Iraq is yet to take place. "The Americans have prepared the war, we have prepared the post-war. And the transfer of power on June 30 will not change anything regarding our objectives. This new provisional government appointed by the Americans has no legitimacy in our eyes. They are nothing but puppets." Why have these former officers waited so long to come out of their closets? "Because today we are sure we're going to win." Secret rendezvous Palestine Hotel, Tuesday, 3pm. One week after a formal request, the prospect of talking with the resistance is getting slimmer. We reach a series of dead ends - until a man we have never met before discreetly approaches our table. "You still want to meet members of the resistance?" He speaks to my associate, a female Arab journalist who has been to Iraq many times. Talk is brief. "We meet tomorrow morning at the Babel Hotel," the man says before disappearing. Against all expectations, this contact seems to be more reliable than the ones we have previously tried. Hotel Babel, Wednesday, 9am. At the entrance of the cybercafe, mobbed by foreign mercenaries, the man we saw the day before lays it down: "Tomorrow, 10 o'clock, al-Saadoun Street, in front of the Palestine. Come without your driver." We arrive at the meeting place on Thursday morning by taxi. The contact is there. After a brief "Salam Alekum" we get into his car. "Where are we going?" No reply. We drive for more than two hours. In Baghdad, even when traffic is not totally blocked by military checkpoints, traffic jams are permanent. In one year, more than 300,000 vehicles have been smuggled into the country. Every other car has no license plate and most drivers don't even know what "driver's license" means. "We'll be there soon. Do you know Baghdad?", asks our man. The answer is clearly no. To get oriented in the sprawling city, one must circulate freely, and on foot. With criminal behavior spreading like a virus, a wave of kidnappings, the 50 or 60 daily attacks against the occupation forces and the indiscriminate response of the American military, there's hardly any incentive to do any walking. The car stops in an alley, near a minibus with tinted windows. One of its doors opens. On board, there are three men and a driver carefully scrutinizing all the streets and houses around us. If we don't know at all what we are confronted with, our interlocutors seem to know very well who they're talking to. "Before any discussions, we don't want any doubts on your part about our identities," they say, while extracting some papers from inside a dusty plastic bag: identity cards, military IDs and several photos showing them in uniform beside Saddam Hussein. They are two generals and a colonel of the disbanded Iraqi army, now on the run for many months, chased by the coalition's intelligence services. "We would like to rectify some information now circulating in the Western media, that's why we took the initiative of meeting you." Our discussion lasts for more than three hours. Back to the fall of Baghdad "We knew that if the United States decided to attack Iraq, we would have no chance faced with their technological and military power. The war was lost in advance, so we prepared the post-war. In other words: the resistance. Contrary to what has been largely said, we did not desert after American troops entered the center of Baghdad on April 5, 2003. We fought a few days for the honor of Iraq - not Saddam Hussein - then we received orders to disperse." Baghdad fell on April 9: Saddam and his army where nowhere to be seen. "As we have foreseen, strategic zones fell quickly under control of the Americans and their allies. For our part, it was time to execute our plan. Opposition movements to the occupation were already organized. Our strategy was not improvised after the regime fell." This plan B, which seems to have totally eluded the Americans, was carefully organized, according to these officers, for months if not years before March 20, 2003, the beginning of Operation Iraqi Freedom. The objective was "to liberate Iraq and expel the coalition. To recover our sovereignty and install a secular democracy, but not the one imposed by the Americans. Iraq has always been a progressive country, we don't want to go back to the past, we want to move forward. We have very competent people," say the three tacticians. There will be of course no names as well as no precise numbers concerning the clandestine network. "We have sufficient numbers, one thing we don't lack is volunteers." Fallujah The lethal offensive of the American troops in Fallujah in March has been the turning point as far as the resistance is concerned. The indiscriminate pillage by American soldiers during their search missions (according to many witnesses) and the sexual humiliation inflicted to prisoners, including Abu Ghraib in Baghdad, have only served to magnify the anger felt by most Iraqis. "There's no more trust, it will be hard to regain it." According to these resistance leaders, "We have reached the point of no return." This is exactly the point of view of a Shi'ite woman we had met two days earlier - a former undercover opposition militant against Saddam: "The biggest mistake of the occupation forces was to despise our traditions and our culture. They are not satisfied with having bombed our infrastructure, they tried to destroy our social system and our dignity. And this we cannot allow. The wounds are deep and the healing will take long. We prefer to live under the terror of one of our own than under the humiliation of a foreign occupation." According to Saddam's generals, "more than a year after the beginning of the war, insecurity and anarchy still dominate the country. Because of their incapacity to control the situation and to maintain their promises, the Americans have antagonized the population as a whole. The resistance is not limited to a few thousand activists. Seventy-five percent of the population supports us and helps us, directly and indirectly, volunteering information, hiding combatants or weapons. And all this despite the fact that many civilians are caught as collateral damage in operations against the coalition and collaborators." Who do they regard as "collaborators"? "Every Iraqi or foreigner who works with the coalition is a target. Ministries, mercenaries, translators, businessmen, cooks or maids, it doesn't matter the degree of collaboration. To sign a contract with the occupier is to sign your death certificate. Iraqi or not, these are traitors. Don't forget that we are at war." The resistance's means of dissuasion led to an ever-shrinking list of candidates to key government posts proposed by the coalition, and this in a country ravaged by 13 years of embargo and two wars where unemployment has been a crucial problem. The ambient chaos is not the only reason preventing people from resuming professional activity. If the Americans, quickly overwhelmed by the whole situation, had to take the decision to reinstate former Ba'athists (policemen, secret service agents, military, officials at the oil ministry), this does not apply to everybody. The majority of victims of administrator L Paul Bremer's decree of May 16, 2003 applying the de-Ba'athification of Iraq is still clandestine. The network Essentially composed by Ba'athists (Sunni and Shi'ite), the resistance currently regroups "all movements of national struggle against the occupation, without confessional, ethnic or political distinction. Contrary to what you imagine in the West, there is no fratricide war in Iraq. We have a united front against the enemy. From Fallujah to Ramadi, and including Najaf, Karbala and the Shi'ite suburbs of Baghdad, combatants speak with a single voice. As to the young Shi'ite leader Muqtada al-Sadr, he is, like ourselves, in favor of the unity of the Iraqi people, multiconfessional and Arab. We support him from a tactical and logistical perspective." Every Iraqi region has its own combatants and each faction is free to choose its targets and its modus operandi. But as time goes by, their actions are increasingly coordinated. Saddam's generals insist there is no rivalry among these different organizations, except on one point: which one will eliminate the largest number of Americans. Weapons of choice "The attacks are meticulously prepared. They must not last longer than 20 minutes and we operate preferably at night or very early in the morning to limit the risks of hitting Iraqi civilians." They anticipate our next question: "No, we don't have weapons of mass destruction. On the other hand, we have more than 50 million conventional weapons." By the initiative of Saddam, a real arsenal was concealed all over Iraq way before the beginning of the war. No heavy artillery, no tanks, no helicopters, but Katyushas, mortars (which the Iraqis call haoun), anti-tank mines, rocket-propelled grenade launchers and other Russian-made rocket launchers, missiles, AK 47s and substantial reserves of all sorts of ammunition. And the list is far from being extensive. But the most efficient weapon remains the Kamikazes. A special unit, composed of 90% Iraqis and 10% foreign fighters, with more than 5,000 solidly-trained men and women, they need no more than a verbal order to drive a vehicle loaded with explosives. What if the weapons' reserves dwindle? "No worries, for some time we have been making our own weapons." That's all they are willing to disclose. Claiming responsibility "Yes, we have executed the four American mercenaries in Fallujah last March. On the other hand, the Americans soldiers waited for four hours before removing the bodies, while they usually do it in less than 20 minutes. Two days earlier, a young married woman had been arbitrarily arrested. For the population of Fallujah, this was the last straw, so they expressed their full rage against the four cadavers. The Americans, they did much worse to living Iraqi prisoners." The suicide attack which provoked the death of Akila al-Hashimi, a diplomat and member of the Iraqi Governing Council on September 22, 2003, was also perpetrated by the resistance, as well as the car bomb which killed the president of the Iraqi executive body Ezzedin Salim in May 17 this year at the entrance of the Green Zone (which Iraqis call the Red Zone, due to the number of resistance offensives). They are also responsible for the kidnapping of foreigners. "We are aware that the kidnapping of foreign nationals blemishes our image, but try to understand the situation. We are forced to control the identity of people circulating in our territory. If we have proof that they are humanitarians or journalists we release them. If they are spies, mercenaries or collaborators we execute them. On this matter, let's be clear, we are not responsible for the death of Nick Berg, the American who was beheaded." As to the attack against the UN headquarters in Baghdad on August 20, 2003: "We have never issued an order to attack the UN and we had a lot of esteem towards the Brazilian Sergio Vieira de Mello [special UN representative who died in the attack], but it's not impossible that the authors of this suicide attack come from another resistance group. As we have explained, we don't control everything. And we must not forget that the UN is responsible for the 13 years of embargo we have endured." What about the October 27, 2003 attack against the Red Cross in Baghdad? "This had nothing to do with us, we always had a lot of respect for this organization and the people who work for them. What would be our interest to attack one of the few institutions which has been helping the Iraq population for years? We know that people from Fallujah have claimed this attack, but we can assure you they are not part of the resistance. And we also add: for political and economic reasons, there are many who have an interest in discrediting us." After June 30 "Resolution 1546 adopted on June 8 is nothing but one more web of lies to the eyes of many Iraqis. First, because it officially ends the occupation by foreign troops while authorizing the presence of a multinational force under American command, without stipulating the date of their removal. Second, because the Iraqi right to veto important military operations, demanded by France, Russia and China, was rejected. Washington has conceded only a vague notion of partnership with the Iraqi authority and did not think of anything in case of disagreement. Iraqis are not fools, the maintenance of American troops in Iraq after June 30 and the aid money they will get from the American Congress leave no doubt over the identity of who will really rule the country." What about a possible role for the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO)? "If NATO intervenes, it's not to help our people, but to help the Americans leave this quagmire. If they wanted our well-being, they would have made a move before," say the three officers while looking at their watches. It's late and we have largely exceeded our allotted time. "What American troops cannot do today, NATO troops won't be able to do later on. Everyone must know: Western troops will be regarded by Iraqis as occupiers. This is something that George W Bush and his faithful ally Tony Blair will do well to think about. If they have won a battle, they have not won the war yet. The great battle is still to begin. The liberation of Baghdad is not far away.

Kim-Sun-il,nje tjeter viktime Nje civil qe nuk kishte te bente fare me luften ne Irak,e megjithate vritet,qeveria e Korese e vendosur per te mos dialoguar me Terrorin,dhe e vendosur per te quar edhe trupa te tjera ne Irak,te dyja krahet kane idealet e tyre,njeri krah do dale i humbur,le te presim se cfare do na sjelle e ardhmja! :wave:

Poshte SH.B.A Kriminelja Nr 1 Ja dhe USA shpetimtare ne Irak:

Ekzekutimi makaber i Paul Marshall Johnson! Jepini,shprehni gjithe neverine,perbuzjen,urrejtjen e thelle per ata kafshe pylli qe kryen nje krim monstruoz si ky dhe qe,shyqyr zotit,i qeruan! Si tha edhe Edward Norton te "25th hour": In the name of the innocents murdered I pray you spend the rest of eternity with your 72 whores roasting in a jet-fuelled fire in hell! You towel-headed camel jockeys can kiss my royal Irish a.ss!

konfederate ballkanike - cfare mendoni duke u takuar me shume ballkanas, qofshin rumun, bullgare serb apo maqedonas shikoj se kemi nje mentalitet dhe mendoj se eshte vec politika apo interesat politike qe e kane bere ballkanin fuci baruti. te gjithe shtetet ballkanike jane te tejlodhura nga koha dhe gjithsecili ka qellime territoriale ndaj tjetrit po keshtu ekonomikisht jane te gjith njelloj te varfer. pse te mos mbeshtetet ideja e krijimit te nje shteti ballkanik si konfederate?????? BVetem kjo do ti she´shonte ceshtjet territoriale.

Tirana!!!!!!!!! Nga nje teme e jo para shume kohesh ne Af e vjeter! Tirana ~ndryshimet ~foto ~kuriozitete ~cfare ju mungon ngu kryeqyteti Dhe cdo gje tjeter qe ta te beje me qendren administrative te Shqiperise! eM :thumbsup:

jemi perendimor apo oriental!!! kjo periudha kaq e gjate e tranzicionit shqiptar ka hutuar jo vetem mua por edhe shume nga bashkemoshataret e mi mbi faktin: ne vertete duam te futemi ne BE. po a kem me te vertete mentalitet Europian? po e le te hapur temen dhe pres me padurim pergjigjet tuaja.... :rolleyes:

Desh e hengri dhe AL-ZARQAWI: Me sulmin qe bene forcat aleate dje ne Falluxha,u vrane 18 militante islamike dhe u plagosen disa te tjere,mendohej qe ne ate shtepi ishte edhe Al-Zarqawi por per fat te keq ai arriti te shpetonte.Prezenca e Al-Zarqawit ne Irak i shton edhe me teper mundesite e kaosit,atentateve,vrasjeve dhe terrorit ne Irak.

Franca dhe Gjermania, a duhet te perzjehen ne Irak? Pasi Amerikanet e bene corben ne Irak me gjithe rezistencen e ashper te komunitetit boteror, tani shija e corbes se gatuar me duart e tyre spo u pelqen. A mendoni se kete corbe duhet ta hane tani edhe shtete te tjera? A mendoni se do te arrijne qe te vriten dhe ushtare franceze dhe gjermane per te nxjerre geshtenjat amerikane nga zjarri Irakian? ============================== A mund te arrihet kjo me kercenime? ================================== U.S. senators urge Paris and Berlin to help Iraq AP Monday, June 21, 2004 WASHINGTON France and Germany came under strong criticism Sunday by senators who say more international help, including the support of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, will be needed to provide security in Iraq after the transfer of political control at month's end. "If we don't hand over the capacity for this sovereign government to be secure within its own borders and to be at peace with itself, then we're going to inherit a circumstance in Iraq that is equally as dangerous to us" as having ousted President Saddam Hussein in power, said Senator Joseph Biden, a Democrat of Delaware. "It's time for NATO, and particularly the French and the Germans, to act more responsibly now," Biden said, notwithstanding their frustration with President George W. Bush. Biden was one of three senators who met with Iraq's interim prime minister, Iyad Allawi, in Baghdad on Saturday. France and Germany have said repeatedly that they will not send troops to Iraq. The Senate majority leader, Bill Frist, Republican of Tennessee, was asked about the refusal so far by France and Germany to make new troops available and to help address Iraq's large foreign debt. "It's really time that they do step up," Frist said. Senator Lindsey Graham, Republican of South Carolina, who joined Biden on the trip to Iraq, said he agreed with Biden's call for more involvement by France and Germany and an active role for the military alliance. Graham said that after being in Iraq he learned that "this is a world problem if we fail." "It could be a world success if we succeed," Graham continued. "But the international community has a chance to be helpful at a time when Iraq needs it the most," said Graham, who appeared with Biden on ABC News's "This Week." Graham said the U.S.-led coalition made mistakes after the war that deposed Saddam, among them underestimating the number of people needed and the difficulty of securing international aid. "We have made it difficult at times to get international cooperation. But that's in the past. It is now time for NATO to help where NATO can," Graham said. "We need so many services, the Iraqi people do, that could turn this thing on a dime." Frist, who also visited Iraq recently, said on Fox television, "I'd like to see NATO come forward somewhat more aggressively." Bush, at an economic summit this month on Sea Island, Georgia, discussed the possibility of an expanded role for NATO in Iraq, and the issue is to resurface at an alliance summit June 28 and 29 in Turkey. Sixteen of the 26 NATO members have troops in Iraq and the alliance provides logistical help for a Polish-led division in the country. The Bush administration wants the alliance to take on more duties, like training Iraq's new army and sending more troops. Biden, top Democrat on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, said he thought that U.S. forces would have to stay in Iraq well through December 2005. American military commanders, he said, "are aware that there is going to have to be a surge of forces" as elections approach in January. He said that more time, energy and money would be needed to get allies to help train Iraqi forces. "The idea that we're going to have an Iraqi police force that's competent and an Iraqi military that's competent to take care of their own security in the next six months to a year is totally unrealistic," Biden said. The coalition should reach out to the major world powers to entice them "to participate in various ways into the deal here," Biden said. As for the U.S. presence, Biden said, "We cannot have additional American troops. But we're not going to be in a position where we have fewer American troops."

Vdes Ronald Regan... Retrospektive luftes se ftohte. Ish-Presidenti i SHBA Ronald Regan nderroi jete sot pas nje lufte te gjate me nje semundje te rralle. Regan dreitoi SHBA ne nje nder periudhat me kritike... gjate Luftes se Ftohte

zgjedhjet evropiane me 25 me ne fund Europa pranoi ne gjirin e saj 10 vende te reja nga lindja. Per here te pare pra votonin 25 vende per te zgjedhur parlamentin evropian, organ qe influencon jo pak jeten e shtetasve te BE. Nje trend i pergjithshem qe u shenua ne gjithe kontinentin e vjeter ishte mos pjesamarrja ne proçesin zgjedhor. Me i theksuar ky fenomen ishte pikerisht ne 10 vendet e fundit qe sapo u futen ne familjen evropiane. Interesant eshte edhe rezultati qe forca te ndryshme politike ne vendet evropiane morren ne keto zgjedhje. Gjeja e perbashket eshte humbja e perqindjes se votave te partive qe jane ne pozite, ose me mire te partive te liderave (Shroder, SHirak, Blair, Berlusconi etj)me perjashtim te Spanjes, ku Zapatero konfirmoi edhe njehere fitoren e linjes dhe te partise se tij dhe rasti i Greqise ku Nea Demokracia fitoi perseri. Besoj se te gjithe po ndjekim valen e reformave qe po behen ne Gjermani, Itali, France, Angli, pergjithesisht jane reforma qe kane te bejne me politikat ekonomike te ketyre vendeve qe per te qendruar ne parametrat evropian duhet shpesh te behen jo popullor ndermjet elektoratit. Kjo ne nje fare menyre shpjegon edhe arsyen e renies se perqindjeve te liderave qe udheheqin Evropen. çfare skenare priten tani ne Evrope me riekulibrimin e gupeve parlamentare??? cilat do te jene pasojat e ketyre zgjedhjeve ne ato politike qe shume vende presin maksimumi brenda dy vjetesh? mund te jete kjo nje lloj prove per partite per te matur pulsin e elektoratit ne prag te zgjedhjeve politike??