Seri atentatesh

Seri atentatesh

besoj se te tere i keni degjuar zhvillimet e fundit ne Kenia
Ne nje hotel kane gjetur vdekjen 15 persona, pas nje atentati te bere nga organizata akoma te paidentifikuara.
ndersa nje avion i nje kompanjie izraeliane i ka shpetuar vetem per disa metra sulmit te nje rakete toke-ajer.(avioni kishte me shume se 200 pasegjere)
Tashme objektivat izraeliane po goditen edhe jashte territorit çifut.
Hamasi mohon çdo pergjejgesi duke nenvizuar faktin se atentatet e saj kryhen vetem ne territor Izraelian.
Dikush avancoi mundesine e nje imlpikimi te Al Qaedes, por asgje nuk eshte e sigurte.
Besoj se Keto aksione forcojne poziten e atyre qe duan luften(Sharon, Bush, Blair), dhe natyrisht nuk jane nje rruge e drejte per te arritur drejt paqes.
Dhe neqoftese keto aksione do te vazhdojne, njerezit e thjeshte, duke u ndier te kercenuar do te jene dakort natyrisht me perdorimin e dhunes.
 

Herkuli

Primus registratum
Re: Seri atentatesh

......... Asnje koment personal ketu!!! .........................
Nejse po te tregoj nje version tjeter te ngjarjes nga nje hetues .......................
........................ idem ........
Nga El Paredon ne soc.culture.palestine,
Mossad Bombs Paradise Hotel in Mombasa
The precise anatomy of an attack that only "looked like" it was targeted on
Jews

Copyright Joe Vialls, 30 November 2002

BY THE WAY OF DECEIT!

On 28 November it was reported that "al Qaeda" had blown up the
Israeli Paradise Hotel at Kikambala Beach near Mombasa, and synchronously
launched a missile attack on an Arkia Airlines Boeing 757, taking off from
Mombasa Airport en-route for Tel Aviv with 264 Israeli passengers on board.
There was wild media talk of outstanding Israeli bravery in the face of
these horrifying Muslim atrocities, but in reality the entire "dual attack"
was a lookalike invented by the Mossad, designed to deflect attention away
growing anger in Indonesia about direct CIA and Mossad involvement in the
12 October bombing of Kuta Beach in Bali. More about this motive later in
the report, but first let us use real-time and photographic evidence to
prove this deliberate Israeli illusion.
The first proof that the Kikambala Beach operation was a covert
Israeli sting, came less than an hour after the massive bomb blast, with a
tame television anchorman in New York repeatedly asking a reporter at the
Paradise hotel about "the other attack on the Israeli airliner taking off
from Mombasa." The timing of these questions was impossible, because the
pilots aboard the Arkia Airlines Boeing 757 had not reported any incident.
Serving as proof of this critical omission, there is no record of any
"Mayday" or "Pan" call on the Kenyan air traffic control tapes at any time
on 28 November 2002. So now we know the New York media was deliberately
telling us about a mid-air incident which never occurred.
Simultaneously at the Paradise Hotel, hordes of Israeli tourists
were filmed sitting on top of their heavy suitcases more than 200 meters
away from the building. Nearly every reader is conversant with hotel
evacuation drills. You are told repeatedly that "human life is important,
possessions are not". This priority never changes, with standard emergency
instructions worldwide urging patrons to "Stay calm, check the room to
ensure no-one is left, leave your belongings where they are, and walk
briskly to your assembly point - do not run." Nowhere in the rules is there
any instruction to risk the lives of your children and yourself, by slowly
and laboriously dragging a fifty-pound suitcase more than two hundred meters
towards the beach.
The tourists sitting calmly on their suitcases at the beach, is
explained by the fact that the Paradise Hotel is a "turnkey" operation,
one-hundred-percent owned by the Israelis and thus under their complete
control. You cannot walk in off the street and book a room, because the
entire hotel is reserved strictly for Israeli tourists, including a sizeable
number of Mossad operatives on "Rest and Recuperation". This was a
controlled operation from the start, with nearly all of the Israeli guests
cleared away from the buildings before the charges were detonated.

Next, Mossad agents led the compliant Kenyan media to a spot
just outside the Mombasa Airport perimeter fence, and showed journalists the
"discarded launch tubes" of two shoulder-launched surface-to-air heat
seeking missiles, allegedly fired at the Arkia Boeing 757 as it passed
overhead at 500 feet. They were real launch tubes complete with pistol grips
designed to fire the SA-7b "Strela" missile, but minus the heavy battery
packs which the "Arab terrorists" inexplicably decided to run away with.
Believe me, there is no way you can fire the Strela without its heavy
battery pack. The launch tubes had also been resprayed brilliant sky-blue,
a color which provides excellent contrast for media location and recording
on Betamax video, but is absurd for operational use. The only colors the
Strela is issued in from the factory, are camouflage khaki or olive drab.
The SA-7b Strela is an infra red heat seeker that locks onto
hot engine exhaust gases, and will rush off at Mach 1.75 to kill any
aircraft [without active magnesium flare protection] that flies within its
slant range of 3 miles. Immediately after launch the equipment operator
becomes irrelevant, with the missile doing the rest all by itself. Sure it
sometimes has a bit of a problem with helicopters which deflect their hot
engine gases up through the rotor blades, but the huge gaping red-hot engine
orifices of a Boeing 757 at point blank range, are the Strela's ultimate wet
dream.
If one of these rather phallic missiles had actually been fired
at the Arkia 757 from the Mombasa runway overrun area, it would have
automatically and immediately streaked inside one of the 757's irresistible
orifices, and blown the entire engine pod off the wing with its powerful HE
warhead. Two missiles would have blown off two engine pods, making the
Boeing extremely difficult to control, to say the very least of it.

The sky-blue Strela launch tube "discarded" by Mossad near Mombasa
Airport. Note total lack of residue in pictures left and right. Centre pic
shows a real Strela with wide array of ancillary guidance equipment and
power packs needed for launch.

Fortunately you do not have to take my word for this. Look very
closely at the Strela launch tube photographs shown on this page. The launch
and propellant charges of the Strela are very messy, and always leave a lot
of dirty residue on the muzzle and exhaust pipe of the launcher after a
missile has been fired. There is not the slightest trace of residue on
either Strela launcher at Mombasa, proving conclusively that they were never
used for live launches, and were thus placed in the grass solely as stage
props to reinforce the Israeli myth.
No doubt a few avid television viewers might retort, "What about
the Israeli captain of the Boeing? He said he saw two smoke trails from the
missiles". Really? It would be more productive to focus on exactly what the
captain told the media, and whether his statement could be even remotely
correct. The captain's exact words were, "We saw two white stripes coming up
from behind the airplane on the left side a bit above us." As you will see
from the photo of the Arkia Boeing 757 on this page, the aircraft is not
fitted with rear view mirrors or a tail warning radar. No pilot sitting on
the flight deck of a Boeing 757 can see "behind" the aircraft because
rearward vision is severely restricted. With the "stretched" version of the
Boeing 757 they were flying, the Arkia pilots would consider themselves
lucky if they could twist around far enough to see their own wings. Nor
would they have done so at this entirely critical point in the flight.
The aircraft had just rotated off the hot runway at Mombasa with
a full load of fuel and passengers, and was at its most vulnerable. Lose an
engine at this point, which means half your total thrust on a twin-engine
Boeing 757, and you need to be a very slick pilot to get the airplane back
on the ground in one piece at all. So beyond question, both pilots had their
eyes glued firmly to the instrument panel at the precise time the captain
subsequently claimed, "We saw two white stripes coming up from behind the
aircraft." You decide whether or not the captain was telling the truth,
bearing in mind that he also claimed he "felt a bump", inferring one of the
"phantom" missiles had glanced off the airplane. On arrival at Ben Gurion
airport in Palestine the airplane was checked for damage by television
media, and not a single scratch or blemish was found on its immaculate paint
work.
As previously stated, and apart from gratuitously trying to
establish a direct link between Palestinians and the fictional "al Qaeda" in
the form of CIA/MI6/Mossad "suspect" Abdullah Ahmed Abdullah, the motive for
this staged Mossad "attack" was almost certainly to combat increasing
dissent over the Bali bombing, with the intent of getting suspicious
westerners back on side. The very nature of the covert operation provides
several strong clues, as do the various stage props provided by the Mossad
for local and international media networks

Imaginative computer graphics issued to the media by Mossad in the wake
of the scam, to help viewers "understand" how this impossible attack was
[not] launched. Note the two "al Qaeda terrorists" without guidance systems
or battery packs!

At the basic subliminal level, you were supposed to acknowledge
this "cowardly" attack by "al Qaeda" on "Israeli civilians" who were simply
on holiday having a good time at "Kikambala Beach", where the blasts were
caused by a "suicide bomber" and a "car bomb". You were repeatedly shown
hundreds of feet of video film reinforcing this myth, with lots of waving
palm trees, and distraught Jewish survivors sitting on the beach.
Surely the covert Kikambala operation subliminally reminds you
of another "cowardly" attack by "al Qaeda" on "Australian civilians", who
were simply on holiday having a good time at "Kuta Beach" in Bali on 12
October? It is remarkably similar in many ways, right down to the fine
details of a "suicide bomber" and "car bomb" The entire operation was
designed to [hopefully] prove that poor Israelis on holiday suffer as much
as poor Australians do, at the "ruthless" hands of "al Qaeda" and/or the
interchangeable "Jemaah Islamiyah".
Well, perhaps not exactly. More than one hundred Australians
died at Kuta Beach, but only three Israelis died at Kikambala Beach. As if
to make up for this inferior body count, you were told that "al Qaeda" had
also fired two SA-7b "Strela" heat seeking missiles at an unarmed Israeli
airliner. Poor brave Israelis, huh?
I am not callously ingoring the loss of life where local
residents are concerned, it is simply a matter of not having accurate
figures to use. To the best of my knowledge, approximately 100 Indonesians
perished at Kuta Beach, while at least 15 Kenyans were killed at Kikambala
Beach. Sadly perhaps, this heavy death toll will be regarded by the CIA and
Mossad as irrelevant "collateral damage."

During the ten days immediately preceding the Kikambala
operation, things had gone from bad to worse for American and Australian
investigators trying to prove that "al Qaeda" and "Jemaah Islamiyah" were
responsible for the Kuta Beach atrocity. On Monday 18 November, Indonesian
Parliamentary Speaker Amien Rais said he questioned the validity of the
police conclusion that "Amrozi" was the main perpetrator of the Bali
bombings. Rais was supported by Deputy House Speaker A.M. Fatwa, who stated,
"`My conscience says that he is not a key actor. I don't believe that Amrozi
has the capability to make all kinds of the preparations for the bombings,
like setting off a kind of micro nuclear bomb in Bali."
These pointed observations by two of the most powerful
politicians in Indonesia caused a storm of discontent across the entire
nation, with most Indonesians justifiably claiming that the CIA and Mossad
were responsible for the outrage in Bali. Then events accelerated rapidly,
with politicians from Jakarta personally visiting Kuta Beach. This was
followed by the sudden recall of the police general in Bali, who for weeks
prior to this had managed to produce endless "Muslim suspects" for the
Americans and Australians, at the same staggering speed a conjurer might
pull rabbits out of a hat. But just like the rabbits, the Muslim suspects
were just clever illusions. And so it was that quite suddenly, with their
tame police general removed from the island and escorted back to Jakarta,
the CIA and Mossad knew the game was up.
The risks involved in Bali finally being exposed as a joint
CIA-Mossad operation are awesome, and far more dangerous in their own way
than the multiple allegations about 9/11. Though many investigators
including myself have proved with ease that nearly half the named 9/11
"hijackers" are still alive and well today, and that forged evidence was
deliberately planted at the crime scene in New York, none individually or
severally have sufficient hard evidence to prove that 9/11 was a
premeditated scam launched by Judeo-Christian crusaders, rather than by
fictional Muslim "al Qaeda terrorists".
Bali is quite different. Because it is known that the only
possible source for the weapon named by Deputy Speaker A. M. Fatwa is Dimona
in Israel's Negev Desert, this single atrocity has the easy ability to
unravel the entire carefully-constructed post- 9/11 "War on Terror", and its
more recent oil-rich cousin, the "War on Iraq". If you successfully unravel
the Bali atrocity, and correctly pin the blame on the CIA and Mossad, you
automatically expose both "al Qaeda" and "Jemaah Islamiyah" as organizations
deliberately invented by these two related western intelligence agencies.
Indeed, using this process you prove that the CIA and Mossad ARE THEMSELVES
"al Qaeda" and "Jemaah Islamiyah". Then, and only then, can you use modus
operandi and due legal process to prove beyond doubt that the same two
agencies were also responsible for 9/11.
This frightening possibility was a risk the agencies were not
prepared to take, and the Kikambala operation was swiftly arranged to
deflect attention away from the increasing anger in Indonesia.
Unfortunately, there is a remote but worrying possibility that the lookalike
Israeli attack on Kikambala, might have been designed to deliberately
include propaganda enabling future "more sophisticated" attacks on the west.
So far as I know, this is the first time that either the CIA or
the Mossad has actually brought you real television footage of an [unfired]
surface-to-air missile launcher, with the obvious intent of convincing you
that the fictional "al Qaeda" and "Jemaah Islamiyah" not only have access
to such equipment, but are also willing and able to use it against unarmed
civilian airplanes. The big problem, of course, is that this decoy missile
equipment was deliberately placed in position by the Mossad, rather than any
"Muslim terrorist" group.
Though I normally go out of my way to avoid causing public
panic of any kind, now might be a good time to reevaluate just how necessary
it might be for your wife, children or yourself to fly on commercial
airplanes. If the CIA or Mossad feel the need to reinforce hatred and fear
of "al Qaeda" or "Jemaah Islamiyah" at some time in the indeterminate
future, there is now an odds-on chance that at least one of the future
"terrorist atrocities" will involve a pair of [live] Israeli SA-7b Strela
missiles hurtling up from the ground to join with your airliner in a deadly
embrace, immediately after take off from New York, London or Sydney.

Sa per ndonje llaf shqip, shqipja s'ka as llafin e fundit ne keto afere.

Sa per ndonje fjale shqip, lexoni rregulloren (pika 1) dhe shtoni edhe ndonje koment personal. Flm.
 

Admir

Forumium maestatis
Re: Seri atentatesh

Te urresh eshte e lehte, te duash eshte e veshrire.
 

Guest
Re: Seri atentatesh

te urresh esh mekat te falesh esh hyjnore /pf/images/graemlins/wink.gif
 

romeo

Forumium maestatis
Re: Seri atentatesh

ju lutem ti permbaheni temes dhe mos te beni nje liste me aforizma /pf/images/graemlins/wink.gif
 

Herkuli

Primus registratum
Re: Seri atentatesh

Dhe tani pjesa e dyte e filmit me regjisor cifute i xhiruar ne Mombasa te Kenias. Edhe kjo eshte mare nga nje dedektiv privat si edhe pjesa e pare. Dedektivi Privat, Joe Villas <br>
<b>Israel Tries To Steal Mombasa "Evidence" (Izraeli perpiqet te vjedh "Provat" ne Mombasa)</b>
The anatomy of an attack that only "looked like" it was targeted on Jews, Part 2
Perhaps realizing that they had left fatally flawed evidence lying around Mombasa airport, more than a hundred heavily armed Israeli soldiers landed at the East Coast port on December 1, and demanded that the Kenyan Police hand over the "evidence". By all accounts they were particularly anxious to get their hands of the unfired sky-blue "Strela" missile launching tubes left near the end of Runway 21. To their astonishment and considerable anger, the Israeli demand was met with a point-blank "NO".
The Kenyan police had already worked out for themselves that the Strela launchers had not been fired, and were still trying to establish exactly why the crew of Arkia Airlines Flight 582 had ignored standard airport procedures on November 28, and taken off from the wrong runway. Instead of using Runway 03 [heading 030 degrees] where the overrun is the Indian Ocean, Flight 582 had deliberately ignored instructions and taken off in the opposite direction, i.e. from Runway 21 [heading 210 degrees], which rather conveniently took them inland, directly overhead the decoy Strela launchers hidden in the long grass.
Not only that. Because of the prevailing winds, ninety nine percent of all flights out of Mombasa from August thru January take off from Runway 03, and two had done so immediately prior to Arkia Flight 582 taxiing out from the terminal on November 28. So if you were a bunch of bona fide Hollywood "al Qaeda" terrorist fanatics, you would of course shout "Allah Akhbar!" [God is Great], and ride your horses down to the overrun area of Runway 03 on the beach.
Drawing curved daggers to ruthlessly butcher any surfers who got in your way, you would then line your trusty Strela heat seekers up on Flight 582, blow its engine pods off, and carelessly throw the spent launch tubes into the ocean. This is exactly how it is done. I know, because just like all of Hollywood's top Zionists film producers, I too have been to the local video store and rented "Lawrence of Arabia".
Think about it people, think about it. How did the Mossad agents who planted the Strela launchers, know in advance that the crew of Arkia Flight 582 would be the first aircraft to directly violate standard procedures in three years? Put another way, how did they know exactly where to leave the dummy launchers for the media to find? Clearly the Mossad agents had outstanding extra sensory perception, or they arranged the whole illusion with the aircrew, long before Flight 582 taxied out to the runway. You choose whichever you would prefer to be the truth.
Of course, it helps that you now know that the overrun area of Runway 03 is located in ten-feet-deep water, and therefore a very difficult place to expect even the most compliant of media crews to locate and film the sky-blue decoy launch tubes. No, for the Mossad scam to work properly they had to break the rules, and with typical Israeli arrogance, assumed no one would notice the "minor" deception.
But the deception was noticed by Kenyan authorities, who also noticed the launch tubes had not been fired. When they arrived back in Tel Aviv and realized they'd screwed up big time, the Israelis rapidly starting leaking another ingenious tale to the media, which discreetly hinted that the Arkia Boeing 757 "might have been fitted with top secret missile warning equipment", which had somehow miraculously prevented the airplane from being hit by two deadly heat seekers, allegedly fired at point-blank range. As you will see from the pictures below, this was also a complete lie.
In the last few days, the media has started repeating "grave" Israeli warnings that "al Qaeda" will probably use one of these weapons against you or your family when you take off from New York, London or Sydney, so now might be a good time for a mercifully short lesson in shoulder-launched missile capabilities. Of course, the Mombasa scam was contrived to prepare you for "friendly fire" CIA or Mossad "false flag" heat seekers, which they can then blame on the naughty "al Qaeda", but the lesson might still be useful at the personal level. After all, it doesn't really matter exactly who fires the heat seeker, if one of these nasties homes in on the engine or engines of your holiday flight to Florida, Mallorca or Fiji, it could ruin your whole day. But imagine the personal pleasure of being able to watch the missile launch against your own passenger jet, and just have time to brag to the passenger sitting next to you, "Look, that's a Mossad missile!"
The main part of the lesson here, is that there is no such thing as a "secret warning radar" that can protect you from a heat seeker at very low speed and very low altitude, as was [laughably] claimed with Arkia Airlines Flight 582. There are missile warning devices which operate quite well against radar-guided and infra-red missiles at medium and high altitudes, but we won't waste time with these here. The CIA and Mossad can only credibly fire a false flag missile at you that "al Qaeda" might reasonably have access to as well, which limits the field to shoulder-launched heat seekers like the Strela, Stinger, or a handful of others. There are minor differences, but they all work in the same general way.
mossad9.gif

In basic terms the shoulder launched heat seeker is strictly up close and personal, with its overall slant range limited to about three miles. This means that it only has three miles total in which to kill you, from the point at which it first leaves the launch tube to the point at which it flies up your hot jetpipe and blows the engine pod off your wing. In turn this means that shoulder launched heat seekers can really only kill your aircraft very close to the airport, either immediately after take off, or immediately before landing.
There is only one defence, I repeat only one defence, against such weapons at close range, which is to actively and continuously fire magnesium flares from your own airplane. You can't wait for some mythical "secret radar" to warn you of a Strela in the runway overrun area, and then pop a single flare. By the time you [or the "secret radar"] actually reacted to such an attack, you would already be dead, and cremated in mid-air at no extra charge.
Because magnesium burns much hotter than your jet engine exhaust, the heat seeker normally considers one of your multiple popping magnesium flares a really sexy target, instantly falls in love with it, and is thus [hopefully] decoyed away from your comparatively dull jetpipes. Sadly, this is not one-hundred-percent guaranteed.
Military aircraft in combat zones pop flares all the time on take off and approach, because they know full well that there is no "top secret radar" in service that can warn them quickly enough to save their hides. Please note that military aircraft normally do this in someone else's country [Afghanistan for example], and therefore don't give a damn what the falling magnesuim flares might set fire to. A sizeable number of them do hit the ground still burning.
Now the trick here, before you allow your local government to squander $5 million [each] fitting flare dispensers to every airliner in your national fleet, is to remember that what you can do with impunity at Bagram airport in Afghnistan, you most certainly cannot do at John F. Kennedy, London Heathrow or Sydney Mascot. Start firing multiple flares on the take off run at one of these prestigious establishments, and you will very likely set fire to everything from the control tower to the sleek passenger bus taking you and your family to the transit lounge. Put bluntly, counter measures like these are useless for a civil airliner in a civil environment, which is why the CIA and Mossad know they can drop your airplane, yes, your airplane, whenever they feel the need to drive a bit more hatred towards "al Qaeda", or whichever other luckless Muslim group that New York might nominate as "Terrorists of the Month.". .
mossad10.gif

Ja dhe kaq ishte nje tjeter ngjarje e zakonshme terroriste.
Zoti na shpetofte se nuk e kemi te gjate.
 
Top